Prediction of Nerman Fatic [352nd] vs Peter Heller [736th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W W L
Form
L L L W W L W L L LHead-To-Head: Fatic 1 - 1 Heller
They have played 5 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Heller winning 3. The last match between Fatic and Heller was at the Austria F2 (Kramsach), 13-07-2018, Semifinals, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 7-6(2) 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nerman Fatic | 1 |
| Peter Heller | 1 |
| Fatic | Stats | Heller |
|---|---|---|
| 88% (14-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 352 | Ranking | 736 |
| 191 | Highest Rank | 271 |
| 30 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 16 |
| 58% (371-271) | Career Total W/L | 63% (447-257) |
| $73,995 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Peter Heller
86%
(
96 of
111)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 6-4 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 20 | Games Won | 26 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:11:30 | Average Match Time | 1:11:30 |
| 86% (96/111) | 1st Serve % | 67% (59/88) |
| 61% (59/96) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (35/59) |
| 40% (6/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (5/16) |
| 44% (39/88) | Return Points Win % | 41% (46/111) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nerman Fatic vs Peter Heller Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 1 Heller
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 42.08% of points on their second serve, while Heller has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 48.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Heller has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.57% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 43.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heller has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 62% of matches played (W/L 31/ 19), with Heller winning 54.17% (W/L 13/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 311/ 205), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Heller has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 318/ 170), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 3), where as Heller has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 9/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 1 times and Heller being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Heller winning 3. The last match between Fatic and Heller was at the Austria F2 (Kramsach), 13-07-2018, Semifinals, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 7-6(2) 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Heller have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fatic winning 1 times and Heller 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Heller 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 325.96 while Heller has played against players with an average rank of 357.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heller has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 41.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heller has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Nerman Fatic
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Sandro Kopp
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mili Poljicak
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Jan Kupcic
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Nemanja Malesevic
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
19
Total Points Won
13
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Ante Petar Ercegovic
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Nerman Fatic
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Heller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Peter Heller
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Peter Heller
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Peter Heller
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Tim Handel
49%
(
41 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Peter Heller
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Martin Benes
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Piet Luis Pinter
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Peter Heller
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Peter Heller
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Peter Heller
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fatic vs Heller?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fatic Vs Heller is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (371/271) | Win/Loss | 63% (447/257) |
| 57% (822/619) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (963/616) |
| 53% (7028/6255) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7916/6410) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1406 | Aces Total | 1230 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1420 | Total Double Faults | 742 |
| 1:18:19 | Average Match Time | 1:3:39 |
| 513.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 563.6 |
| 67% (21734/32562) | 1st Serve % | 57% (16090/28079) |
| 65% (14165/21734) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (11184/16090) |
| 48% (5160/10828) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6031/11988) |
| 47% (1801/3830) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1513/3292) |
| 43% (14221/32832) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12205/28296) |
| 59% (362/616) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (436/685) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 51% (73/143) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (67/141) |
| 53% (93/177) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (104/182) |
| 88% (365/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (443/394) |
| 11% (365/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (443/49) |
| 18% (277/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (261/51) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
